Cuneiform Digital Library Notes
2011:5        «              »
Two Early Dynastic Capacity Standards

Sara Brumfield
University of California, Los Angeles

This tablet comes from a small, private collection of the Rev. David Alderfer of Downers Grove, Illinois. The remainder of this collection will be published by Lance Allred.

Its shape (76mm x 61mm x 20mm) and the general palaeography of the ŠU, DA and KA signs are consistent with Early Dynastic IIIb and pre-Classical Sargonic forms (Gelb 1977: 6-7; Biggs 1973: 45). Additionally, the use of Sumerian personal names also supports this suggested date range. However, the phrase še zi-ga is more prevalent in the Old Akkadian period, known from Girsu, Umma and Adab, than during the ED III period. Therefore, a date range of ED IIIb – early Old Akkadian seems likely. The provenience is uncertain, but could possibly be Adab based on the rare personal names Ur-Urimaš (see CUSAS 13, 65) and Pirig-nam (Banca d'Italia 1, 154).

This is a ration account recording the disbursement of large quantities of barley to individuals. The most interesting feature of this account are the two distinct standards used to qualify ration measurements.



                    Alderfer 11

transliteration translation
obverse
 col. i
  1. [n] 3(uc) [...] še gurn+30 gur of barley
  2. ur-duri3-mašfor Ur-Urimaš
  3. 2(geš2c) mu-ni-da120 (gur of barley) for Munida;
  4. 2(geš2c) lugal-ša3120 (gur of barley) for Lugal-ša;
  5. 1(geš2c) ur-dinanna?60 (gur of barley) for Ur-Inanna;
  6. 1(geš2c) 1(ašc) ur-den-lil261 (gur of barley) for Ur-Enlil;
  7. 2(uc) 2(ašc) ur-kal-ga22 (gur of barley) for Ur-kalga;
  8. 2(uc) ur-dingir20 (gur of barley) for Ur-dingir;
  9. 4(geš2c) 3(uc) numun
        GAN2 geš? mu11
270 (gur) ...
 col. ii  
  1. lugal-ša3for Lugal-ša3
  2. 1(uc) ur-dutu10 (gur of barley) for Ur-Utu;
  3. sila3 zabar!(KA.BAR)-ta-am3each being the bronze standard.
  4. 1(uc) ur2-bi-še310 (gur of barley) for Urbiše;
  5. 2(geš2c) 1(uc) 5(ašc) e2-u4135 (gur of barley) for E'u;
  6. 1(geš2c) ur-pisan60 (gur of barley) for Ur-pisan;
  7. 3(uc) ur-dnirah30 (gur of barley) for Ur-Nirah;
  8. 3(geš2c) 3(uc) su-bappir-a210 (gur of barley) for Su-bappira;
  9. 2(geš2c) 1(uc) 6(ašc) lugal-[ša3]136 (gur of barley) for Lugal-[ša];
reverse
 col. i 
  1. 4(uc) pirig-nam40 (gur of barley) for Pirig-nam;
  2. 1(geš2c) 3(uc) bar-us290 (gur of barley) for Bar-us;
  3. 3(uc) 1(ašc) 2(barigc) ur-x-mu31 (gur of barley) and 120 sila for Ur-x;
  4. 1(ašc) a? ziz2 maš21 (gur) ... emmer for Maš;
  5. 4(uc) la2 3(ašc) ur-dnin-pirig37 (gur of barley) for Ur-Nin-pirig;
  6. sa2-du11-ta-am3each being the sattukkum standard.
 col. ii 
  1. šu-nigin2 2(geš'uc) 5(gesz2c)
        2(uc) 6(ašc) 3(barigc) še gur
Total: 1526 gur and 180 silas of barley
  2. sila3 zabar-taaccording to the bronze standard;
  3. še zi-gacredited barley
  4. 1(ikuc) GAN2 geš
        mu11-kam-[...]
1 iku ...

The first entry is broken, but given the total at the end of the account and the preserved numbers, 33 gur and 60 sila must be reconstructed in the lacunae. With 30 gur already extant in this first line, the addition of another 30 would make an odd notation for 60. The calculations are problematic and I cannot offer a coherent reconstruction of the first entry at present.

The first nine entries, but subsequently the entire account, are described as being measured according to the bronze standard (sila3 zabar). There are only a few contemporary texts that utilize the bronze standard: an ED IIIb text from Adab (CUSAS 11, 42) and an ED IIIb text from Nippur (OSP 1, 64). There are two addition examples in CUSAS 13, 71 and 76. Moreover, there is an unpublished Old Akkadian text of unknown provenience; however, the surface damage to the text does not allow for a clear reading of the account.

OSP 1, 64 records an entry for 3(u) 1(barig) še lid2-ga sila3 zabar-ta ("7,260 true/standard liters of barley measured according to the bronze standard"). The lidga measurement, widely attested during the Fara period, corresponds to a 240-liter gur (Powell 1989: 495-96). An association between the use of the bronze standard and the 240-liter gur is also seen in CUSAS 11, 42. The calculations work perfectly if we assume a 240-liter gur:

obverse
 col. i
 1.1(geš'uc) 5(geš2c) 8(ašc) la2 3(ban2c) ziz2 gur907 gur and 210 sila of emmer,
 2. gur zabar-tafrom the bronze standard;
 3. x x mah ...
 4. 6(geš2c) 3(uc) 1(ašc) 1(barigc) lugal-ša3
        nu-banda3
391 gur and 60 sila of emmer for Lugal-ša, the nubanda;
 col. ii
 1. 6(geš2c) 2(uc) la2 2(ašc) giri3-ne2 šuš3378 gur of emmer for Girine, the cattle administrator;
 2. 7(geš2c) 4(uc) 8(ašc) 1(barigc) 3(ban2c) ur-pisan468 gur and 90 sila of emmer for Ur-pisan;
 3. 1(geš'uc) 4(uc) 2(ašc) 3(ban2c) ur-UD-BU642 gur and 30 sila of emmer for Ur-UD-BU.
reverse
 col. i
 1. GAN2-IŠField: IŠ
 col. ii
 1. šu-nigin2 4(geš'uc) 6(geš2c) 2(uc) 7(ašc)
        2(barigc) 3(ban2c) sze ziz2 gur
Total: 2787 gur and 150 sila of barley and emmer.
 2. giri3-gen-naIt was for the trip
 3. lugal-x-kamof Lugal-x.

The second standard recorded in Alderfer 11 is the sa2-du11 (Akkadian: sattukku) describing the preceding eleven entries. This standard is known in ED IIIb Girsu for liquid capacity (Powell 1989: 506-7). Clearer correlations in grain metrology come from Old Akkadian Adab, where it is used interchangeably with the gur-mah suggesting a capacity of 240 liters (Zhi 1989: 64-5). However, given the qualification of the bronze standard on the total for the account, it is likely that the sattukku is subsumed under the bronze standard. It is also possible that in this text the notation is not metrological, but rather descriptive.

It appears that in the ED IIIb – Old Akkadian periods at Adab, Nippur and possibly the surrounding areas, the sattukku standard and the bronze standard were based on the 240-liter gur. These standards survive into the Ur III period and become based on the 300-liter gur and demonstrate more distinct spheres of application (e.g. CDLB 2007/2 6).

Based on general observations of the Ur III standards, the sattukku standard appears most frequently with offerings for the temple (e.g. UCP 9-2-1, 53; SAT 2, 1015; BPOA 7, 2212)–as the name implies. Conversely, the bronze standard is closely associated with the royal gur (e.g. ASJ 3, 162 131; BCT 2, 172; CST 649; CST 712; MVN 6, 482). The exact correlation between these standards is still unclear; however, it seems certain that both the bronze and sattukku standards were 240-liter units in the ED IIIb-Old Akkadian period, while in the subsequent Ur III period, they both became based on the 300-liter gur. The precise nature of their transition from one system to the next is not yet understood.



BIBLIOGRAPHY

Biggs, Robert
1973"On Regional Cuneiform Handwritings in Third Millennium Mesopotamia.” OrNS 42, 39-46.
Gelb, Ignace J.
1977"Thoughts About Ibla: A Preliminary Evaluation, March 1977.” Syro-Mesopotamian Studies 1/1, 3-30.
Powell, Marvin
1989"Masse und Gewichte.” RlA 7, 457-530.
Visicato, Giuseppe and Aage Westenholz
2010Early Dynastic and Early Sargonic Tablets from Adab in the Cornell University Collections. CUSAS 11. CDL Press: Bethesda, MD.
Zhi, Yang
1989Sargonic Inscriptions from Adab. Changchun: IHAC.
ISSN 1546-6566    © Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative | Archival: 2011-10-15