As observed by Steinkeller 1995a: 706, the variation in the script only concerns the signs NIMa and NI. O0204 might also be transliterated as: AK NI! GI4.
O0104’. [1N1 x] Ur
O0105’. [1N1] DA ⌜KA⌝ [...]
O0106’. [1N1 x] ⌜Nannax-sul?⌝
The sign considered to be PAD must therefore be replaced by KA, which might belong to the personal name Inim-zi-da, so far unattested in Ur.
Appendix: New copies
* I thank M. Krebernik for his suggestions. I am also thankful to A. Greco for having given me a preliminary version of an article she is preparing on digressions in the Early Dynastic lexical lists.
ISSN 1546-6566 © Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative | Archival: 2014-07-15